One of my favorite advocacy courses is NITA's Trial Skills for Legal Services Attorneys Course. The course is taught at NITA headquarters in Colorado. NITA fully funds the tuition and course expenses for approximately 48 attorneys from legal services agencies across the country. The attorneys (or their agencies) are responsible for their own transportation and lodging arrangements. The faculty all donate their time during the course. The latest iteration of this course took place in Boulder on August 11-14.
In an adversarial legal system the quality of advocacy directly affects the outcome, and hence justice. This blog is for everyone -however they serve our legal system - who is committed to improving the teaching of advocacy skills and ethics so that parties and the community are well served by persuasive and ethical advocates.
OUR FOCUS TOPIC-
If there's an advocacy topic you want to see discussed, or about which you wish to contribute, contact one of the blog administrators - see the list on the right side of this page. Lonely thinking changes nothing, sharing your thoughts may start a trend.
Showing posts with label Intensive Programs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Intensive Programs. Show all posts
Saturday, August 22, 2015
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Becoming an Advocacy Teacher
Another gem from Mark Caldwell, NITA's Director of Specialty Programs.
THOUGHTS ON BECOMING AN ADVOCACY TEACHER
People contact me on a regular basis volunteering to teach for NITA. Often times I give them the NITA party line, “It’s best to attend one of NITA’s Teacher Training Programs so you can appreciate our process of teaching.” Sometimes I talk with them about their experience in the courtroom and where they have previously taught. Depending on the particular needs of my programs and their experience I may offer them an opportunity to teach.
In honesty, it is difficult to break into advocacy teaching. Program Directors or school administrators tend to stick with people they know and who they are comfortable with at their programs. It is not so much a “club” as administrators not wanting to take risks. It is easy to invite people you know and like. Those who appreciate the system and who have been successful at previous programs are regularly invited to return.
The Catch Twenty-two of the process is there are fewer and fewer cases going to trial. Getting trial experience is becoming a real issue for younger lawyers. The economy has also had its impact on advocacy teaching. Registration numbers at programs are lower than in the past. Programs are being cancelled. Budgets are tightening so Program Directors must be highly selective in who they choose to teach - only the best get invited when a program is half the size of past years. Likewise, teaching opportunities are shrinking. Even with law schools attempting to shift to experiential learning there are simply a finite number of courses being taught.
Counter to these trends is the harsh reality that many of the “stalwarts” are getting older. In the not too far future NITA, and many other organizations, will find they have exhausted their supply of teachers as many gracefully go to retirement. Recognizing the “graying” of the organization NITA encourages its Program Directors to recruit new teachers. From my own perspective it is still difficult to take the risk of inviting someone who has never taught before.
Does this mean you should be discouraged and not even attempt to teach? No. There are opportunities to teach and if you want to become a teacher you should reach for your dreams. It just means you will need to work hard to achieve your goal. Here are my thoughts on what someone should do if they want to teach:
1. Become a student of advocacy. If you have not attended an experientially taught advocacy program you need to either attend (regardless of your experience) or ask if you can observe for a day. Advocacy teaching is not about experienced advocates pontificating about how they became successful. It is a very scientific process that works based on how people learn. You need to appreciate how programs work before you can be successful at teaching. The stock line about attending a Teacher Training program is more than lip service. Those who extend invitations to teach pay attention to such credentials - especially if they are accompanied by a recommendation from someone who taught at the program you attended.
2. Master the process of constructive critique. NITA employs a four part system in its teaching. Other successful programs use their own systems. There may be no one right way to teach but all of the systems I know use a process that A) Identifies the specific problem; B) Describes the problem with enough specificity that the student can not deny that she was performing in the way described; C) offers a genuine fix to the problem so that the student can change their behavior in the future; and D) provides a reason why the student should change her behavior.
Is this a lock-step approach? Of course not. The very best teachers I know vary from the process. The one connecting theme is they all follow it more than they deviate from it.
3. Dissect what you do, or someone you admire does, when experiencing success at trial. Great teachers are able to break down the component pieces of each skill utilized at trial. Not only do they know what works and does not work -- they can explain why this is the case. To be a successful teacher you must be able to clearly, and succinctly, tell someone how to perform and why it is important that they do it as described. Start your process immediately. Yes it takes some of the spontaneity out of your practice but it makes you a far better teacher than going on instinct alone.
4. Observe other teachers. Studying how others teach helps you develop your own skills. Even the greatest advocacy teachers borrow ideas from others. There should be no pride of authorship as you develop your own repertory of comments. Attribution is always appreciated but over the years I’ve come to find that many have laid claims to some of the best teaching comments, drills, demonstrations, etc. The bottom line is if something is effective in teaching another how to master a skill - make use of it.
5. Deliver your comments with a positive spin. I’ve seen two teachers deliver the same suggestion to participants at a program. One offered the diagnosis and solution as something the student had done wrong and the other suggested the same fix as a way of helping a solid performance become a stellar performance. The delivery with a smile was met with appreciation while the other was viewed as hyper critical. Creating the atmosphere that I’m here to help you improve versus I’m here to teach you how to do it right is significant.
6. Learn to offer comments efficiently. Time is always a factor when teaching. As much as we like to believe it is our comments that turn students into great advocates, the reality is performances are what help students improve. Certainly teacher comments give direction and help students make a determination of how best to perform but it is repetition that actually leads to mastery. Keep in mind the cardinal rule that one or two points are all a student can recall and integrate. Your comments should be efficient and to the point. The more time you spend talking the less time your students perform. Don’t steal their time.
7. Develop effective demonstrations. The best demonstrations do not overpower students. Your goal should never be to have students say, “Wow, I could never do that!” Instead, following your demonstration students should say, “Wow, so that’s how you do it. I think I can do it too.” Your demonstrations should illustrate the component parts of each skill. Offering too much in a demonstration is like offering nothing. If students can’t recall how to do something the time is wasted.
8. Play well with others. Team teaching can either take everyone to new heights as instructors play off each other, or suck the very life out of a room as teachers compete to show students their intelligence. Cooperative teaching lets both instructors star and ensures that students get the most from their performances. Learn to communicate both in the teaching room and outside. Nothing frustrates students more than instructors who appear disorganized and not ready to teach. Make sure you share coaching responsibilities. Remember that teaching is not about the teacher but the students.
9. Let people know you want to teach on a regular basis. Squeaky wheels get attention and so do people who make it known that they want to teach. This is not to suggest that you pester Program Directors, Academic Deans, or colleagues who teach. Do let people know you want to teach. Check calendars and make your offer timed to when invitations are being extended. You are more likely to get your opportunity if you time your contact to about two to three months in advance.
10. Do not say no. When your first opportunity presents itself you had best say yes. Your acceptance speaks volumes about your interest while your declining suggests perhaps you are not as committed as you indicated. If you have a great reason to say no then make sure you clearly explain why you are not available. Ask if you can substitute at a time when you are not otherwise engaged. If you are lucky you may get a second invitation. I never ask someone to teach more than twice.
Do not think you will always get invited to the big show as a first opportunity. Program Directors often give people an opportunity at programs where expectations are lower. It may be the subject matter is not your favorite or slightly outside your comfort zone. Say yes and work hard to succeed. Many professional athletes and actors toil in the minor leagues before they get the chance at the highest level. You should do the same.
Teaching, like being a student, is a lifetime occupation. The best teachers I know are always looking for new material, considering how to more effectively communicate an idea, refining their presentations, and talking with others about the process. I can think of no greater reward than helping someone improve their skills. Each time I teach I mentally thank those who helped me learn both the skills of advocacy and the craft of teaching. Each time I teach I leave the course with a feeling of accomplishment and my emotional and intellectual batteries recharged. I highly commend the process and encourage those who are interested to take the steps necessary to be become effective in the classroom.
THOUGHTS ON BECOMING AN ADVOCACY TEACHER
People contact me on a regular basis volunteering to teach for NITA. Often times I give them the NITA party line, “It’s best to attend one of NITA’s Teacher Training Programs so you can appreciate our process of teaching.” Sometimes I talk with them about their experience in the courtroom and where they have previously taught. Depending on the particular needs of my programs and their experience I may offer them an opportunity to teach.
In honesty, it is difficult to break into advocacy teaching. Program Directors or school administrators tend to stick with people they know and who they are comfortable with at their programs. It is not so much a “club” as administrators not wanting to take risks. It is easy to invite people you know and like. Those who appreciate the system and who have been successful at previous programs are regularly invited to return.
The Catch Twenty-two of the process is there are fewer and fewer cases going to trial. Getting trial experience is becoming a real issue for younger lawyers. The economy has also had its impact on advocacy teaching. Registration numbers at programs are lower than in the past. Programs are being cancelled. Budgets are tightening so Program Directors must be highly selective in who they choose to teach - only the best get invited when a program is half the size of past years. Likewise, teaching opportunities are shrinking. Even with law schools attempting to shift to experiential learning there are simply a finite number of courses being taught.
Counter to these trends is the harsh reality that many of the “stalwarts” are getting older. In the not too far future NITA, and many other organizations, will find they have exhausted their supply of teachers as many gracefully go to retirement. Recognizing the “graying” of the organization NITA encourages its Program Directors to recruit new teachers. From my own perspective it is still difficult to take the risk of inviting someone who has never taught before.
Does this mean you should be discouraged and not even attempt to teach? No. There are opportunities to teach and if you want to become a teacher you should reach for your dreams. It just means you will need to work hard to achieve your goal. Here are my thoughts on what someone should do if they want to teach:
1. Become a student of advocacy. If you have not attended an experientially taught advocacy program you need to either attend (regardless of your experience) or ask if you can observe for a day. Advocacy teaching is not about experienced advocates pontificating about how they became successful. It is a very scientific process that works based on how people learn. You need to appreciate how programs work before you can be successful at teaching. The stock line about attending a Teacher Training program is more than lip service. Those who extend invitations to teach pay attention to such credentials - especially if they are accompanied by a recommendation from someone who taught at the program you attended.
2. Master the process of constructive critique. NITA employs a four part system in its teaching. Other successful programs use their own systems. There may be no one right way to teach but all of the systems I know use a process that A) Identifies the specific problem; B) Describes the problem with enough specificity that the student can not deny that she was performing in the way described; C) offers a genuine fix to the problem so that the student can change their behavior in the future; and D) provides a reason why the student should change her behavior.
Is this a lock-step approach? Of course not. The very best teachers I know vary from the process. The one connecting theme is they all follow it more than they deviate from it.
3. Dissect what you do, or someone you admire does, when experiencing success at trial. Great teachers are able to break down the component pieces of each skill utilized at trial. Not only do they know what works and does not work -- they can explain why this is the case. To be a successful teacher you must be able to clearly, and succinctly, tell someone how to perform and why it is important that they do it as described. Start your process immediately. Yes it takes some of the spontaneity out of your practice but it makes you a far better teacher than going on instinct alone.
4. Observe other teachers. Studying how others teach helps you develop your own skills. Even the greatest advocacy teachers borrow ideas from others. There should be no pride of authorship as you develop your own repertory of comments. Attribution is always appreciated but over the years I’ve come to find that many have laid claims to some of the best teaching comments, drills, demonstrations, etc. The bottom line is if something is effective in teaching another how to master a skill - make use of it.
5. Deliver your comments with a positive spin. I’ve seen two teachers deliver the same suggestion to participants at a program. One offered the diagnosis and solution as something the student had done wrong and the other suggested the same fix as a way of helping a solid performance become a stellar performance. The delivery with a smile was met with appreciation while the other was viewed as hyper critical. Creating the atmosphere that I’m here to help you improve versus I’m here to teach you how to do it right is significant.
6. Learn to offer comments efficiently. Time is always a factor when teaching. As much as we like to believe it is our comments that turn students into great advocates, the reality is performances are what help students improve. Certainly teacher comments give direction and help students make a determination of how best to perform but it is repetition that actually leads to mastery. Keep in mind the cardinal rule that one or two points are all a student can recall and integrate. Your comments should be efficient and to the point. The more time you spend talking the less time your students perform. Don’t steal their time.
7. Develop effective demonstrations. The best demonstrations do not overpower students. Your goal should never be to have students say, “Wow, I could never do that!” Instead, following your demonstration students should say, “Wow, so that’s how you do it. I think I can do it too.” Your demonstrations should illustrate the component parts of each skill. Offering too much in a demonstration is like offering nothing. If students can’t recall how to do something the time is wasted.
8. Play well with others. Team teaching can either take everyone to new heights as instructors play off each other, or suck the very life out of a room as teachers compete to show students their intelligence. Cooperative teaching lets both instructors star and ensures that students get the most from their performances. Learn to communicate both in the teaching room and outside. Nothing frustrates students more than instructors who appear disorganized and not ready to teach. Make sure you share coaching responsibilities. Remember that teaching is not about the teacher but the students.
9. Let people know you want to teach on a regular basis. Squeaky wheels get attention and so do people who make it known that they want to teach. This is not to suggest that you pester Program Directors, Academic Deans, or colleagues who teach. Do let people know you want to teach. Check calendars and make your offer timed to when invitations are being extended. You are more likely to get your opportunity if you time your contact to about two to three months in advance.
10. Do not say no. When your first opportunity presents itself you had best say yes. Your acceptance speaks volumes about your interest while your declining suggests perhaps you are not as committed as you indicated. If you have a great reason to say no then make sure you clearly explain why you are not available. Ask if you can substitute at a time when you are not otherwise engaged. If you are lucky you may get a second invitation. I never ask someone to teach more than twice.
Do not think you will always get invited to the big show as a first opportunity. Program Directors often give people an opportunity at programs where expectations are lower. It may be the subject matter is not your favorite or slightly outside your comfort zone. Say yes and work hard to succeed. Many professional athletes and actors toil in the minor leagues before they get the chance at the highest level. You should do the same.
Teaching, like being a student, is a lifetime occupation. The best teachers I know are always looking for new material, considering how to more effectively communicate an idea, refining their presentations, and talking with others about the process. I can think of no greater reward than helping someone improve their skills. Each time I teach I mentally thank those who helped me learn both the skills of advocacy and the craft of teaching. Each time I teach I leave the course with a feeling of accomplishment and my emotional and intellectual batteries recharged. I highly commend the process and encourage those who are interested to take the steps necessary to be become effective in the classroom.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Critiques - How and When to use Praise
Mark Caldwell's recent post about what we owe our students brings us full circle back to one of my posts from a few weeks ago (available here). In recounting a recent advocacy course, he mentions that some instructors were substituting praise for critiquing and that the students were disappointed.
This matches my own recent experience, in which my advocacy students in a law school course commented that they wanted more critiques of their performances. This sparked a number of comments from other bloggers and readers about what it means to critique.
I can only speak for myself on this issue, but I will admit that it is sometimes easier to dispense praise than criticism after an advocacy performance. This is particularly true when the performance has been a good one.
I agree with Tom Stewart's insightful comment to my earlier post that our job is to find teachable moments and then help our students learn. This can involve using a praiseworthy performance as a teaching moment by pointing out a technique and discussing why it worked so well under these circumstances.
Most of the time, however, if we work hard enough in evaluating a student, we can find something to help improve them as advocates. This is not always true, but it is almost always true. With good students, we have to work much harder, even if we use a collaborative critiquing method such as those advocated by Charlie Rose in some of his blog postings and presentations.
What I think Mark is talking about here is the substitution of relatively shallow praise for the hard work of digging in and helping a student become better. We have to search for the teachable moment. "Good job, I thought you really made some good points on that cross-examination," doesn't really cut it.
What role should praise play? I think it should be given when it is actually needed. Most of us have worked with students who have experienced tremendous growth during an advocacy course. After days (or in the case of a law school course, weeks) of being critiqued, they deserve praise when they finally turn in that golden performance; it's their just reward. But the rest of the time--unless it's part of one of Tom Stewart's teachable moments--we ought to keep it under wraps and be about the business of helping advocates become better.
This matches my own recent experience, in which my advocacy students in a law school course commented that they wanted more critiques of their performances. This sparked a number of comments from other bloggers and readers about what it means to critique.
I can only speak for myself on this issue, but I will admit that it is sometimes easier to dispense praise than criticism after an advocacy performance. This is particularly true when the performance has been a good one.
I agree with Tom Stewart's insightful comment to my earlier post that our job is to find teachable moments and then help our students learn. This can involve using a praiseworthy performance as a teaching moment by pointing out a technique and discussing why it worked so well under these circumstances.
Most of the time, however, if we work hard enough in evaluating a student, we can find something to help improve them as advocates. This is not always true, but it is almost always true. With good students, we have to work much harder, even if we use a collaborative critiquing method such as those advocated by Charlie Rose in some of his blog postings and presentations.
What I think Mark is talking about here is the substitution of relatively shallow praise for the hard work of digging in and helping a student become better. We have to search for the teachable moment. "Good job, I thought you really made some good points on that cross-examination," doesn't really cut it.
What role should praise play? I think it should be given when it is actually needed. Most of us have worked with students who have experienced tremendous growth during an advocacy course. After days (or in the case of a law school course, weeks) of being critiqued, they deserve praise when they finally turn in that golden performance; it's their just reward. But the rest of the time--unless it's part of one of Tom Stewart's teachable moments--we ought to keep it under wraps and be about the business of helping advocates become better.
Labels:
Critique - guidelines,
Intensive Programs
Monday, September 20, 2010
What 'We' the Teachers Owe to our Students
Another great post from Mark Caldwell at NITA.
What do we owe our students?
I just finished teaching a program where many of the instructors had not received any formalized teacher training. All were experienced trial lawyers and genuinely caring individuals who wanted to help improve trial skills. I was struck by the number of comments that began with “I really liked what you did....” This was followed by additional comments such as “You asked good open ended questions and the witness seemed engaged with you. Keep up the good work.” I observed the disappointment in the eyes of the students as they recognized this experienced trial lawyer was not actually going to offer them any assistance.
It is not that these comments were disingenuous - those complements were rooted in truth, as many of the performances demonstrated a working knowledge of the skills we were focusing upon. The students and I were disappointed the instructor failed to find a teachable moment in the performance.
Just what is it we “owe” to students when we teach? Our obvious goal is to help our students gain knowledge and improve their skills through experiential teaching.
I believe we “owe” a number of things to those we teach. Let me give you my list:
1. Honesty. We all want to be “liked” by our students. Does this mean we should cushion the blow of a diagnosed issue with some sugar? I believe the answer is no. The common refrain in today’s teaching is choose one point and offer a strong solution to the problem. When we front our comments with a throw away point it diminishes what we really have to say. Students recognize this fairly early in a course and learn to not listen to this first does of pablum. Often program evaluations suggest students wish some instructors would be more forthright and probing with their comments. They attend to learn and our job is to tell them how to improve. We need to honestly diagnose problems and offer solutions. There are times when a positive comment is warranted. By using it as a teaching point for the others we maintain our honesty as well as continue to teach.
2. Being prepared. If we expect our students to know the facts of the case and to be ready to perform we owe the same to them. This means we should read the case file and know the facts before each class - even if we have used the file many times before. We should be ready to perform in the same way as our students. This means every instructor should be able to stand and deliver the same performance as our students. Preparation also means reading the schedule and understanding the teaching goals of each session. If someone else developed the schedule and you do not understand the goals we owe it to the students to find out what is intended. If there are teaching notes, read them (even if you read them during an earlier program). Attend faculty meetings.
3. Think about the skills you teach. So many instructors have told me they never consider what they do at trial. Whether teaching, or practicing, we have an obligation to our students or clients to consider how best to persuade. If you have never considered why you do something I can not imagine you can explain how or why you “do that thing you do.” Reflection is one of the key points of adult learning theory. It helps you recognize why something worked or failed. It helps to cement the experience in a way that allows you to employ it in a similar or, in the case of failure, a new manner. If we expect students to reflect on our teaching we should do the same for them.
4. Be positive. There are always two ways we can deliver a message. The spin we place on our comments can give a student encouragement or suggest they are failing. When I watch the best teachers offer advice I notice they are always presenting the information in a way that suggests a student can build upon what their performance. Granted, there are some performances that offer little from which to build. Just the same, if you offer a ray of hope it helps. Recognize that most students believe experiential classes are far harder than representing someone at trial. They bring an extra level of anxiety to their performances because they are afraid they will embarrass themselves in front of their colleagues (and sometimes those who control their destinies). Offering someone information that allows them to take their skills to a higher level is far different then suggesting they did something “wrong” and you will fix it.
5. Be on time. Judges do not tolerate tardiness. Neither do our students. Start and end your class sessions based upon the schedule. When you are ready to go and start on time it sends many messages (including one of professionalism). When you end on time it allows people the full measure of their breaks, lets them get to the next class on time, or even allows them to pick up children from day care without paying added fees.
6. Follow the method. There are various schools of teaching in experiential programs. Regardless of which method you employ - use it uniformly. We are taught from the first day of law school that one of the reasons our system works is because of predictability. The same is true about our teaching. These models work and are based upon serious research and refinement. After a few classes our students expect we will follow the process.
7. Do not unfairly change the schedule. Students have spent time preparing for class. When you change the nature of the exercise or fail to allow them to do what they have prepared you send the message - don’t prepare. If you wish to modify the schedule let people know in advance so they can prepare accordingly and be successful. If you plan to change on the fly, follow the schedule for the first set of performances and then make your alterations. The process is frustrating enough without you changing the rules.
There are most likely many other things we owe our students and colleagues as we teach. This list is not exhaustive. Some may disagree with my inclusions or ideas. My goal is to spark a dialog. I look forward to hearing from you.
What do we owe our students?
I just finished teaching a program where many of the instructors had not received any formalized teacher training. All were experienced trial lawyers and genuinely caring individuals who wanted to help improve trial skills. I was struck by the number of comments that began with “I really liked what you did....” This was followed by additional comments such as “You asked good open ended questions and the witness seemed engaged with you. Keep up the good work.” I observed the disappointment in the eyes of the students as they recognized this experienced trial lawyer was not actually going to offer them any assistance.
It is not that these comments were disingenuous - those complements were rooted in truth, as many of the performances demonstrated a working knowledge of the skills we were focusing upon. The students and I were disappointed the instructor failed to find a teachable moment in the performance.
Just what is it we “owe” to students when we teach? Our obvious goal is to help our students gain knowledge and improve their skills through experiential teaching.
I believe we “owe” a number of things to those we teach. Let me give you my list:
1. Honesty. We all want to be “liked” by our students. Does this mean we should cushion the blow of a diagnosed issue with some sugar? I believe the answer is no. The common refrain in today’s teaching is choose one point and offer a strong solution to the problem. When we front our comments with a throw away point it diminishes what we really have to say. Students recognize this fairly early in a course and learn to not listen to this first does of pablum. Often program evaluations suggest students wish some instructors would be more forthright and probing with their comments. They attend to learn and our job is to tell them how to improve. We need to honestly diagnose problems and offer solutions. There are times when a positive comment is warranted. By using it as a teaching point for the others we maintain our honesty as well as continue to teach.
2. Being prepared. If we expect our students to know the facts of the case and to be ready to perform we owe the same to them. This means we should read the case file and know the facts before each class - even if we have used the file many times before. We should be ready to perform in the same way as our students. This means every instructor should be able to stand and deliver the same performance as our students. Preparation also means reading the schedule and understanding the teaching goals of each session. If someone else developed the schedule and you do not understand the goals we owe it to the students to find out what is intended. If there are teaching notes, read them (even if you read them during an earlier program). Attend faculty meetings.
3. Think about the skills you teach. So many instructors have told me they never consider what they do at trial. Whether teaching, or practicing, we have an obligation to our students or clients to consider how best to persuade. If you have never considered why you do something I can not imagine you can explain how or why you “do that thing you do.” Reflection is one of the key points of adult learning theory. It helps you recognize why something worked or failed. It helps to cement the experience in a way that allows you to employ it in a similar or, in the case of failure, a new manner. If we expect students to reflect on our teaching we should do the same for them.
4. Be positive. There are always two ways we can deliver a message. The spin we place on our comments can give a student encouragement or suggest they are failing. When I watch the best teachers offer advice I notice they are always presenting the information in a way that suggests a student can build upon what their performance. Granted, there are some performances that offer little from which to build. Just the same, if you offer a ray of hope it helps. Recognize that most students believe experiential classes are far harder than representing someone at trial. They bring an extra level of anxiety to their performances because they are afraid they will embarrass themselves in front of their colleagues (and sometimes those who control their destinies). Offering someone information that allows them to take their skills to a higher level is far different then suggesting they did something “wrong” and you will fix it.
5. Be on time. Judges do not tolerate tardiness. Neither do our students. Start and end your class sessions based upon the schedule. When you are ready to go and start on time it sends many messages (including one of professionalism). When you end on time it allows people the full measure of their breaks, lets them get to the next class on time, or even allows them to pick up children from day care without paying added fees.
6. Follow the method. There are various schools of teaching in experiential programs. Regardless of which method you employ - use it uniformly. We are taught from the first day of law school that one of the reasons our system works is because of predictability. The same is true about our teaching. These models work and are based upon serious research and refinement. After a few classes our students expect we will follow the process.
7. Do not unfairly change the schedule. Students have spent time preparing for class. When you change the nature of the exercise or fail to allow them to do what they have prepared you send the message - don’t prepare. If you wish to modify the schedule let people know in advance so they can prepare accordingly and be successful. If you plan to change on the fly, follow the schedule for the first set of performances and then make your alterations. The process is frustrating enough without you changing the rules.
There are most likely many other things we owe our students and colleagues as we teach. This list is not exhaustive. Some may disagree with my inclusions or ideas. My goal is to spark a dialog. I look forward to hearing from you.
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Great Advocacy Teachers: what we are looking for.
Mark Caldwell, NITA's Director of Specialty Programs, has kindly agreed to a multi-part guest-blog on selecting and managing faculty for advocacy courses.
I have been asked to share my thoughts on recruiting, grooming, and maintaining program teaching teams. Every NITA Program Director has their own thoughts on how to best staff and run their program. I do not speak for NITA in my comments but share what has been successful for me in my thirty plus years of leading programs. Commenting on all aspects of creating and leading a faculty team would make for a piece that is far too long for one single bite. Let me break my thoughts into three separate topics. I’ll begin with my thoughts on what makes a good learning-by-doing instructor - someone I would actively recruit to a teaching team.
It’s pretty obvious that knowledge of the subject is the foundation of good teaching. However, in today’s world of trial it is not as easy to find new instructors with large amounts of trial experience. Cases settle or the senior lawyers prefer to work the cases that actually go forward. For most civil practitioners there are relatively few opportunities to get trial experience. The conundrum for those recruiting trial teachers is finding the next generation of advocacy teachers. How can you find younger trial lawyers with sufficient experience to meet the credibility threshold?
In that same vein, those with substantial trial experience are not always good teachers. Just because someone is successful at persuading juries and judges does not make them an equally successful teacher. How can you tell if a good trial lawyer will make a good teacher?
Here are a few characteristics I look for in recruiting new instructors:
1. You have to be a student of advocacy to teach advocacy. The best teachers are those who self reflect on what they do to be successful, break their actions into component pieces, and then accurately describe what they do so others understand. In addition, they study others - both those who teach and the students/participants - to absorb successful techniques, turns of phrases, and engaging case stories. There are few truly new ideas in advocacy teaching. The best teachers I know take ideas from others and make them part of their own skill set. Applying the successful ideas of others to impart knowledge is not a sin - as long as you give attribution.
2. Focus always needs to be student centered. Great teachers recognize why everyone is in the classroom - to help the students improve and not pontificate. War stories, personal opinions on case theories, and long winded comments or answers to questions do not help people improve their skills. Ego and personal self aggrandizement do not belong in a successful classroom. The best teachers acknowledge that performance, not comments, is what helps people improve.
3. Knowing when to break the rules as well as when to follow them is a characteristic of an excellent teacher. Lock step adherence to the four part model used in many systems is not the sign of a great teacher. There are times when a coaching model is more appropriate and effective. When following the four part model the best teachers are consistent in their delivery. Failing to include examples or providing a reason for changing behavior as part of comments for improvement leaves students/participants without a complete picture. Good teachers adapt to fit the situation, using techniques that fit the specific situation.
4. The best teachers know that less is more. Limiting comments to one learning point per performance helps students digest and retain ideas compared to being inundated by multiple suggestions. Effective teachers recognize you can cover the same amount of material offering a different point to each student instead of repeating concepts multiple times. In the same vein, good teachers understand that making use of small goals with more repetition increases the chances of retention and success.
5. A sense of time is essential. Every student needs to perform - at least once if not two or three times in each workshop. Managing the clock so there is equity in performance time lets every student know he or she is important. Limiting the time the instructor speaks instead of the students is equally essential. Starting and ending on time sends important messages about professionalism and the value of other portions of the program. Stealing time from breaks and demonstrations is unfair to both students and teaching colleagues. Being late for faculty meetings or the start of class sessions devalues both. Failing to end on time at the end of the day or class session is not just impolite but adds inappropriate emotional and, sometimes, economic penalties to students.
6. Seeing the big picture as well as the immediate goals of each workshop helps successful teachers. By making connections between skills and connecting them for students a teacher helps budding trial lawyers appreciate the process at a far deeper level. For example, showing how you argue facts in closing argument ties into witness examination. Information gather in discovery may not generate the right information if a student fails to appreciate how the information will be used at trial. If you teach each in a vacuum participants fail to appreciate the most effective ways to structure a trial and lay out their case story. By teaching in building blocks the best teachers prepare students to work cases most efficiently.
7. Effective teachers are team players. They attend the presentations of their colleagues on the teaching team and then refer to those presentations in performance groups and their own presentations. They get on board with program schedules and teaching models so there is consistency in programs. There is always room for debate before a program but during a program the best teachers are not rugged individualists.
The list could go on but as I think about the very best teachers I know - the ones that I always want to teach at my programs - these are the Seven Traits of Highly Effective Teachers.
I have been asked to share my thoughts on recruiting, grooming, and maintaining program teaching teams. Every NITA Program Director has their own thoughts on how to best staff and run their program. I do not speak for NITA in my comments but share what has been successful for me in my thirty plus years of leading programs. Commenting on all aspects of creating and leading a faculty team would make for a piece that is far too long for one single bite. Let me break my thoughts into three separate topics. I’ll begin with my thoughts on what makes a good learning-by-doing instructor - someone I would actively recruit to a teaching team.
It’s pretty obvious that knowledge of the subject is the foundation of good teaching. However, in today’s world of trial it is not as easy to find new instructors with large amounts of trial experience. Cases settle or the senior lawyers prefer to work the cases that actually go forward. For most civil practitioners there are relatively few opportunities to get trial experience. The conundrum for those recruiting trial teachers is finding the next generation of advocacy teachers. How can you find younger trial lawyers with sufficient experience to meet the credibility threshold?
In that same vein, those with substantial trial experience are not always good teachers. Just because someone is successful at persuading juries and judges does not make them an equally successful teacher. How can you tell if a good trial lawyer will make a good teacher?
Here are a few characteristics I look for in recruiting new instructors:
1. You have to be a student of advocacy to teach advocacy. The best teachers are those who self reflect on what they do to be successful, break their actions into component pieces, and then accurately describe what they do so others understand. In addition, they study others - both those who teach and the students/participants - to absorb successful techniques, turns of phrases, and engaging case stories. There are few truly new ideas in advocacy teaching. The best teachers I know take ideas from others and make them part of their own skill set. Applying the successful ideas of others to impart knowledge is not a sin - as long as you give attribution.
2. Focus always needs to be student centered. Great teachers recognize why everyone is in the classroom - to help the students improve and not pontificate. War stories, personal opinions on case theories, and long winded comments or answers to questions do not help people improve their skills. Ego and personal self aggrandizement do not belong in a successful classroom. The best teachers acknowledge that performance, not comments, is what helps people improve.
3. Knowing when to break the rules as well as when to follow them is a characteristic of an excellent teacher. Lock step adherence to the four part model used in many systems is not the sign of a great teacher. There are times when a coaching model is more appropriate and effective. When following the four part model the best teachers are consistent in their delivery. Failing to include examples or providing a reason for changing behavior as part of comments for improvement leaves students/participants without a complete picture. Good teachers adapt to fit the situation, using techniques that fit the specific situation.
4. The best teachers know that less is more. Limiting comments to one learning point per performance helps students digest and retain ideas compared to being inundated by multiple suggestions. Effective teachers recognize you can cover the same amount of material offering a different point to each student instead of repeating concepts multiple times. In the same vein, good teachers understand that making use of small goals with more repetition increases the chances of retention and success.
5. A sense of time is essential. Every student needs to perform - at least once if not two or three times in each workshop. Managing the clock so there is equity in performance time lets every student know he or she is important. Limiting the time the instructor speaks instead of the students is equally essential. Starting and ending on time sends important messages about professionalism and the value of other portions of the program. Stealing time from breaks and demonstrations is unfair to both students and teaching colleagues. Being late for faculty meetings or the start of class sessions devalues both. Failing to end on time at the end of the day or class session is not just impolite but adds inappropriate emotional and, sometimes, economic penalties to students.
6. Seeing the big picture as well as the immediate goals of each workshop helps successful teachers. By making connections between skills and connecting them for students a teacher helps budding trial lawyers appreciate the process at a far deeper level. For example, showing how you argue facts in closing argument ties into witness examination. Information gather in discovery may not generate the right information if a student fails to appreciate how the information will be used at trial. If you teach each in a vacuum participants fail to appreciate the most effective ways to structure a trial and lay out their case story. By teaching in building blocks the best teachers prepare students to work cases most efficiently.
7. Effective teachers are team players. They attend the presentations of their colleagues on the teaching team and then refer to those presentations in performance groups and their own presentations. They get on board with program schedules and teaching models so there is consistency in programs. There is always room for debate before a program but during a program the best teachers are not rugged individualists.
The list could go on but as I think about the very best teachers I know - the ones that I always want to teach at my programs - these are the Seven Traits of Highly Effective Teachers.
Friday, June 4, 2010
Forthcoming Blog Topics - Here's a sampling
We've just invited a number of distinguished advocacy teachers to join us in authoring this blog.
Possible topics for forthcoming blog entries from them include the following:
Innovative Teaching Techniques
Trial Teams and Competitions
Advocacy Scholarship
Course Design
Assessment and Grading
Critiquing Methodology
Lifelong Learning
Drills
Demonstrations
Intensive Advocacy Programs
Alumni Relations
Adjunct Relations
The Wisdom of Josh Karton
Possible topics for forthcoming blog entries from them include the following:
Innovative Teaching Techniques
Trial Teams and Competitions
Advocacy Scholarship
Course Design
Assessment and Grading
Critiquing Methodology
Lifelong Learning
Drills
Demonstrations
Intensive Advocacy Programs
Alumni Relations
Adjunct Relations
The Wisdom of Josh Karton
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)