I'd be interested to know what opinions the readership of this blog have about this issue. Is the article correct? If so, what is the right solution? Should prosecutors be allowed peremptories at all? The article quotes a law professor as stating that prosecutors have abused their use of peremptory challenges and should no longer be allowed to use them.
In an adversarial legal system the quality of advocacy directly affects the outcome, and hence justice. This blog is for everyone -however they serve our legal system - who is committed to improving the teaching of advocacy skills and ethics so that parties and the community are well served by persuasive and ethical advocates.
OUR FOCUS TOPIC-
If there's an advocacy topic you want to see discussed, or about which you wish to contribute, contact one of the blog administrators - see the list on the right side of this page. Lonely thinking changes nothing, sharing your thoughts may start a trend.
Thursday, August 20, 2015
Link to a Sobering Article on Race and Peremptory Challenges
A friend sent a link to an article that the New York Times recently published about the role of race in peremptory challenges by criminal prosecutors in jury voir dire. I've included the link in this blog post, and I highly recommend that you read the article. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/17/us/politics/exclusion-of-blacks-from-juries-raises-renewed-scrutiny.html?_r=1
Labels:
Jurors,
Jurors - selection of,
race,
Voir Dire
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment