On April 21, 2011, Michael Tigar, Washington College of Law, American University Professor Emeritus and, currently, Professor of the Practice of Law at Duke University School of Law, delivered the 2011 Stephen S. Weinstein Distinguished Lecture on April 21, 2011 titled “The True Rules of Cross-Examination.” Professor Tigar provided an alternative viewpoint to the late Judge Irving Younger’s renowned, “Ten Rules of Cross Examination.” For example, Tigar advocates the use of non-leading questions on cross-examination as sometimes more persuasive than leading questions, provided counsel is thoroughly prepared and, as a result, is able to maintain witness control.
Professor Tigar’s presentation included reading from the trial transcripts of some of his high profile cases to support his arguments. Tigar has represented clients, such as The Washington Post, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, Scott McClellan, Rep. Ronald Dellums, Mobil Oil, Fernando Chavez, and Terry Lynn Nichols, one of the defendants in the Oklahoma bombing case. He has tried cases before a myriad of courts across the country and argued seven cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Even if you missed attending the presentation, you can watch it through this link. It’s a must see!
In an adversarial legal system the quality of advocacy directly affects the outcome, and hence justice. This blog is for everyone -however they serve our legal system - who is committed to improving the teaching of advocacy skills and ethics so that parties and the community are well served by persuasive and ethical advocates.
OUR FOCUS TOPIC-
If there's an advocacy topic you want to see discussed, or about which you wish to contribute, contact one of the blog administrators - see the list on the right side of this page. Lonely thinking changes nothing, sharing your thoughts may start a trend.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Professor Michael Tigar's "The True Rules of Cross-Examination"
Labels:
Cross Examination
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment