This exercise is a variation on the opening statement drills Charlie Rose has described in an earlier posting on this blog. I use it at the beginning of the semester as an icebreaker exercise. The students have to interview each other, then give an opening statement or short speech about their interview partner.
I focus the students' efforts by giving them several mandatory interview topics:
1) Hometown
2) Educational background
3) Nickname
4) Favorite movie and why
5) Favorite ice cream flavor and why
It's always quite a bit of fun. It gets the students on their feet, and we always learn something interesting about everyone in the room. When it's over, I explain that this process is similar to trial in several ways: 1) the students have to interview someone and obtain information about them; 2) they have to decide how to organize their statement in the most effective way possible; 3) they have to stand in front of another group of people and tell a story.
I have 14 students in my summer term advocacy class, and it took about 40 minutes of our 100-minute block for this exercise. It's well worth it. In larger classes (I usually have a lecture section with 48 students that is divided into six 8-student labs), we still do the exercise, but not everyone is called on.
In an adversarial legal system the quality of advocacy directly affects the outcome, and hence justice. This blog is for everyone -however they serve our legal system - who is committed to improving the teaching of advocacy skills and ethics so that parties and the community are well served by persuasive and ethical advocates.
OUR FOCUS TOPIC-
If there's an advocacy topic you want to see discussed, or about which you wish to contribute, contact one of the blog administrators - see the list on the right side of this page. Lonely thinking changes nothing, sharing your thoughts may start a trend.
Monday, June 14, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment